Thursday, December 13, 2007
Tailevu Districts Differ on Illegal Charter View
Wednesday, December 5, 2007
Restorative Justice Good for Fiji
Restorative justice ‘a healing process’ | ||
| Last updated 12/5/2007 - www.sun.com.fj | ||
| | ||
| |
Tax privileges
Letter to Editor - www.fijitimes.com, 5 Dec 2007
Dividends from Fijian Holdings Unit Trust
A lot have been said and published in the media recently about tax privileges to Fijian Holdings Limited and Fijian Holdings Unit Trust. It is unfortunate that FHL and Fijian Holdings Unit Trust had been singled out, although the removal of tax exemption announced in the 2008 Budget Address was applicable only to the Unit Trust of Fiji. I therefore offer the following for the purpose of clarification.
Fijian Holdings Unit Trust was established in April 2001 to provide another investment opportunity to the growing investor communities in Fiji. It is open to all communities in the country and because of its low-entry level and competitive return it has become very popular particularly to our rural-based investors.
To imply that the tax exemption was enjoyed only by FHL shareholders and unit-holders of Fijian Holdings Unit Trust is a mis-statement. The fact is, all dividends paid out by the 16 companies listed on the stock exchange (and FHL is only one of them) are exempt from tax because the income has been subject to tax at the company level.
Similarly all unit-holders in the Unit Trust of Fiji, Colonial State Funds and the Fijian Holdings Unit Trust are enjoying the same privileges. These measures were part of the Government's policy to grow the capital markets in Fiji, which is consistent with measures taken in other developed markets. Funds under management in these locally-registered unit trusts have grown from over $60million in 2001 to close to $180million at end of 2006. Unit-holders in the Fijian Holdings Unit Trust only account for 21 per cent of the total 14,000 unit-holders in all the unit trusts in Fiji who enjoy such privileges.
Information with regard to dividend paid to the shareholders of FHL is available for public record at the Companies Office. Suffice to say that the company pays dividend at a rate of 20 cents per shares for A-class shareholders and 10 cents per share for B-class shareholders.
In conclusion, FHL and Fijian Holdings Unit Trust reiterate that their affairs are being conducted in accordance with law and for the benefit of their members. The companies will pursue legitimate commercial goals, and will continue to support the enhancement of the nation's economic stability in Fiji.
Jaoji Koroi
CEO - Fijian Holdings Trust Management Limited
Friday, November 23, 2007
Fijian Affairs Downgraded
Fijian Affairs surprise
Saturday, November 24, 2007
IN a surprise move, the interim Government has downgraded the Ministry of Fijian Affairs to department level.
Interim Fijian Affairs Minister Ratu Epeli Ganilau declined to comment on the development.
The Budget Estimates index said the ministry was now a Department of Indigenous Affairs, Provincial Development and Multi-Ethnic Affairs while Page 46 of the publication referred to the entity as a ministry.
It is understood the department will now come under the Office of the interim Prime Minister.
The Fijian Affairs Ministry was responsible for the preservation of the different cultures in Fiji, lease and land administration, education assistance and rural development.
The ministry was also responsible for the Native Land Trust Board and the Great Council of Chiefs two institutions under close scrutiny by the interim administration. Both have undergone extensive reviews.
It is understood that the restructure of the ministry is in line with the Cabinet reshuffle interim Prime Minister Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama will announce in a week's time.
The confusion was also evident in the Budget Estimates book, with Pages 44 to 45 of the book empty, with the heading 'Refer to Page 24 and 25 for Public Enterprise Reform', as last minute changes were made late last night to some aspects of the restructure and reshuffle.
Once the change is implemented, Commodore Bainimarama will take on the responsibility of implementing a People's Charter which has an allocation of $4.6million. This will also include the Department of Information, which was also downgraded in the new Budget.
The Ministry of Industrial Relations, Employment, Youth and Sports has also been merged with Youth and Sports.
The Ministry of Agriculture has become the Ministry of Primary Industries and has merged with the Ministry of Fisheries and Forests.
The Ministry of Works has merged with Transport and Energy. The ministry was allocated $251million compared to $235million in the 2007 revised Budget.
The Ministry of Tourism has merged with Trade, Industry and Communication. The Ministry of Public Enterprise and the Public Service Commission will also come under the ambit of the interim Prime Minister's Office.
The Attorney General's office and the Ministry of Finance, National Planning and Sugar remain the same.
Illegal Regime's Budget 2008
The ups and downs of State expenditure
Saturday, November 24, 2007
Interim Finance Minister Mahendra Chaudhry, right, at the press conference after handing down Budget 2008
THE State has announced a $1.52billion Budget with $1.2billion to be spent mostly on wages. Capital expenditure will take up $269million.
Allocations by department were:
-Office of the President, $1.56million (compared to $1.6million this year); Prime Minister's Office and People's Charter for Change, $5.14m ($5.64m for 2007);
-Public Service Commission and Public Enterprise, $13.7m ($13.9m);
-Ministry of Finance, National Planning and Sugar Industry, $90.24m ($104.3m);
-Ministry (Department) of Provincial Development, Indigenous and Multi-Ethnic Affairs, $45.9m ($47.2m);
-Ministry of Defence, National Security and Immigration, $5.3m ($5.4m);
-Ministry of Foreign Affairs International Co-operation and Civil Aviation, $20.94m ($21.13m);
-Office of the Auditor General, $3.17m ($2.81m);
-Elections Office, $4.24m ($707,000);
-Judiciary, $12.38m ($12.11m);
-Legislature, $1.01m ($1.48m);
-Office of the Ombudsman, $1.47m ($1.42m);
-Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, $4.6m ($3.89m);
-Ministry of Justice, $2.01m ($2.12m);
-Fiji Prisons Service, $13.7m ($13.5m);
-Department of Information, $4.42m ($6.5m);
-Fiji Military Forces, $81.5m ($80.7m);
-Fiji Police Force, $70.53m ($69m);
-Ministry of Education, National Heritage, Culture and Arts, $25.5m ($26.1m);
-Ministry of Health, $139.5m ($150.8m);
-Department of Local Government and Urban Development, $3.52m ($3.96m);
-Ministry of Housing Women and Social Welfare, $32.2m ($29.2m);
-Ministry of Industrial Relations, Employment Youth and Sport, $12.43m ($13.32m);
-Ministry of Primary Industries, $58.7m ($62m);
-Ministry of Lands, Mineral Resources and Environment, $40.75m ($47.9m);
-Ministry of Industry, Tourism, Trade and Communications, $31.27m ($30.6m);
-Ministry of Transport, Works and Energy, $251.1m ($235.6m).
Monday, November 12, 2007
No charter yet, says Chand
Monday, November 12, 2007
A PEOPLE'S Charter has not been formulated yet because all there is so far is a proposal to develop a charter, says permanent secretary to the Prime Minister's Office, Parmesh Chand.
He said that in that regard, there was an extensive awareness and consultation campaign under way.
"Its objective is to explain to ordinary people the processes, the steps and the deliberations which will take place," Mr Chand said.
He said these changes would help develop a People's Charter for change and Progress over a period of 12-14 months.
"The Office of the Prime Minister therefore encourages members of the public and relevant stakeholders to express their views and to be part of the process to develop the charter," he said.
Mr Chand was reacting to comments made by Rewa one of the three largest provinces rejecting the proposed People's Charter for Building a Better Fiji. The province said it disagreed with efforts to ignore the existence of indigenous Fijians.
Ro Dona Takalaiyale, the leader of the Sauturaga clan and spokesman of the Rewa Bose Vanua, issued Rewa's position in a statement last week.
Ro Dona described the charter as "a creation of non-racial Fiji and written by two foreigners without input from Fijians or their elected representatives".
He also voiced concern about interim Prime Minister Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama's statements about his desire to abolish all communal seats through the People's Charter.
"Also Lt-Col Mataitoga's statement that Affirmative Action will be abolished under the charter. Also the charter is inconsistent with the UN Declaration on Rights of Indigenous People's Article 3-5 where indigenous people are entitled to participate in the political life of the state," Ro Dona said.
"It is inconsistent with the 1997 Constitution where race is recognised as an integral element of the nation of Fiji."
Ro Dona said the Bose Vanua resolved to boycott any referendum or election that would be influenced by the charter.
Monday, October 22, 2007
Prisons system faces review
ROBERT MATAU
www.fijitimes.com - Tuesday, October 23, 2007
Prisoners at a church service. Soon criminals will face a new way of sentencing
Fiji's prisons are overcrowded, a recent study featured last week in this column said.
The study warned if the overcrowding and the lack of staff and resources were not addressed the system could breakdown.
One of the areas looked at in the report, compiled by the Australia-Fiji Community Justice Sector program in March, 2006, was how a problem solving court would be developed and shortly be piloted in selected areas.
It adds a customary and traditional flavour to the sentencing of Fijian people in an alternative disciplinary measure more understanding of their culture.
"The aim of this new style of court is to identify and address the problems that are causing offending behaviour and to treat the cause so that criminal behaviour stops," the report said.
"Called Problem Solving Courts, they are for sentencing only. That is, they are not trial courts.
"Aimed primarily at reducing the number of young indigenous Fijians and other young people from entering the prison system unnecessarily, the court adopts approaches that are part of Fijian culture (veisorosorovi) but operate within the mainstream legal system.
"Advisers from the communities will sit with the magistrate and advise on particular issues for the offender and suggest remedies.
"Wherever possible, the advisers will be from the same community as the offender and will bring their connection to those communities and make the sentences imposed by the magistrate more meaningful to the offender.
"The courts will combine punishment with help and can be the gateway to treatment and rehabilitation.
"The courts will operate in urban and rural areas and victims will be able to put their issues before the court and be heard. Except when operating as a Juvenile Court, the court will be open and transparent to the community at large."
The report said that in appropriate situation (e.g. village settings) the court can be much less formal than most magistrates courts.
In that case the report said a formal court setting would not be required; the village hall could be used. "Unlike the normal court setting everyone will be allowed to speak. It may be that the chiefs or leaders from other communities will sit with the magistrate and this will assist in re-engaging approaches to traditional dispute resolution with mainstream justice," the report says.
"It is an approach that aims to encourage respect, commitment and obligation and aims to reinforce the Fijian tradition of caring for others in the community.
"The focus will be on diversion, treatment and rehabilitation and keeping people out of prison if this is possible and appropriate.
"Serious offences will not be dealt with by the Problem Solving Court. Problem Solving Courts have the full support and endorsement of the Great Council of Chiefs.
"It is generally accepted that offenders placed on properly administered community-based programs (particularly probation and community work) have a much higher rate of success than similar offenders serving short prison sentences and this presents as the most effective way of reducing the prison numbers and affords the greatest possibility of rehabilitation.
"Although some short- term prison sentences are inevitable, the community will be better served if the majority were placed on non-custodial sentences. (Some jurisdictions have passed legislation restricting the use of short sentences in order to force courts to use community based alternatives)."
The report said if all prisoners serving less than three months in 2005 were given community sentences instead of jail time, prison intake would have been reduced by almost 30 per cent.
"If this were extended to sentences of less than nine months the intake would have dropped by 50 per cent without any appreciable impact on community safety," it states.
"Through the Law and Justice Strategic Leadership Group the Ministry for Justice and the Ministry for Women, Social Welfare and Poverty Alleviation (that has statutory responsibility for Probation and Community Work) have joined with the ministries of youth, employment opportunities and sport, Fijian affairs and provincial development, and other stakeholders, to develop a model system that will allow community based corrections to expand to all areas of Fiji.
"The new model is being piloted in selected locations before its introduction to the remainder of the country.
"Although the model will cater for all ages and races it specifically targets indigenous Fijian offenders aged 25 years and less."
The report says increasing community based court dispositions will eventually lower the number of people entering the prison system and will allow the prison service to devote its resources to address the rehabilitation needs of longer term prisoners.
It noted a 35 per cent increase in the number of prisoners aged 25 years or less and this group now makes up almost 50 per cent of the prison population.
"The increase in the number of young prisoners entering the system is cause for some concern, particularly as 32 per cent were imprisoned for the first time," the report says. "Providing programs for young people in prison presents its own challenges.
"It is known that young people are less mature and more easily influenced by their older counterparts. Prisons, particularly overcrowded ones with poor living conditions, tend to be criminogenic, that is, they are more likely to support and reinforce criminal values and lifestyles than promote personal development and rehabilitation.
"Offenders aged 25 and under are responsible for 57 percent of all violent offences, including rape and indecent assault.
"They are responsible for 67 per cent of all non-violent offences, and offences against property. "Without proper programs the prospect of rehabilitation for many in this group is not good."
It noted the rise in the number of young people sentenced for sexual and other violent offences against the person was a cause for concern, particularly as there were no specialist remedial or intervention programs available in Fiji prisons for this type of offending.
"These groups potentially pose the greatest concern to the community if their offending behaviour is perceived not to have been addressed while they are in prison," the report states.
"However, the majority of prisoners convicted of violent offences do not fall into the æextremely serious' category and programs that deal with impulse control, anger management and cognitive skill development, along with other rehabilitation and personal development programs that address the causes of offending, are possible to be delivered and would maximises the chances of offenders' successful integration into the community.
"In 2005 an extraordinary 67 per cent of all prisoners entered the prison system for the first time (compared to 52 per cent in 2002). Figures for both years are extremely high and suggest major issues in sentencing practices and highlight the need for more suitable non-custodial sentencing options."
For now these recommendations and conclusions hold a way out for our prisons system — ultimately at the tail end of the criminal justice system.
Whether there is a will to carry out the changes and recommendations will be a matter for the policy makers to decide.